Scores, winners and data below compare these brokers as CFD/FX brokers: leveraged trading on forex, indices, commodities and crypto. Scores, winners and data below compare these brokers as stock brokers: real shares and ETFs you own outright.
Saxo
Regulated in your country Saxo operates in Australia through Totality Wealth, which is allowed by ASIC to onboard clients residing in Australia.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.
Trading 212
Regulated in your country Trading 212 is allowed by ASIC to onboard clients residing in Australia.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.
Best for
What we compare A comparison of the kinds of traders Saxo and Trading 212 are best suited to, based on what each one actually offers in Australia.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for day traders, professional traders and high-volume traders. Both are a good fit for long-term investors, swing traders and news traders.
| Overall score | Saxo 84 Best 84 Best | Trading 212 66 -18 70 -14 |
|---|---|---|
| Day trading i | ||
| Long-term investing i | ||
| Professional traders i | ||
| High-volume traders i | ||
| Scalpers i | ||
| Swing traders i | ||
| News traders i | ||
| Algo traders i | ||
| Stock traders i | ||
| Crypto traders i | ||
| Futures traders i | ||
| Options traders i |
Regulation
What we compare A comparison between the financial authorities that supervise Saxo and the ones that supervise Trading 212.Saxo and Trading 212 are both regulated in Australia, by ASIC.
| Section score | Saxo 100 100 | Trading 212 100 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Tier-1 regulators | ||
| ESMA (European Union) i | ||
| FCA (United Kingdom) i | ||
| ASIC (Australia) i | ||
| CFTC (United States) i | ||
| NFA (United States) i | ||
| SEC (United States) i | ||
| CIRO (Canada) i | ||
| MAS (Singapore) i | ||
| SFC (Hong Kong) i | ||
| JFSA (Japan) i | ||
| FINMA (Switzerland) i | ||
| Tier-2 regulators | ||
| FMA (New Zealand) i | ||
| CBR (Russia) i | ||
| FSCA (South Africa) i | ||
| DFSA (Dubai) i | ||
| CSRC (China) i | ||
| ISA (Israel) i | ||
| LFSA (Malaysia) i | ||
| JSC (Jordan) i | ||
| CMA (Kenya) i | ||
| Tier-3 regulators | ||
| FSA (Seychelles) i | ||
| MMA (Maldives) i | ||
| SCB (Bahamas) i | ||
| FSC (Mauritius) i | ||
| VFSC (Vanuatu) i | ||
| FSC (Belize) i | ||
| CIMA (Cayman Islands) i | ||
| SV FSA (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines) i | ||
| FSRC (St. Kitts & Nevis) i | ||
| BMA (Bermuda) i | ||
| BVI FSC (British Virgin Islands) i | ||
| EDR (External Dispute Resolution) i | ||
Safety
What we compare A comparison of the tools and services that Saxo and Trading 212 have in place to protect your money in Australia.Saxo and Trading 212 both offer segregated client funds and two-factor authentication.
| Section score | Saxo 66 66 | Trading 212 66 66 |
|---|---|---|
| Company info | ||
| Is it publicly traded i | ||
| Is it a bank i | ||
| Year founded i | 1992 | 2004 |
| Parent company i | DMA Pty Ltd | Trading 212 Group Limited |
| CEO i | Kim Fournais | Michael Byrne |
| Money safety | ||
| Segregated client funds i | ||
| Two-factor authentication i | ||
| Investor compensation scheme i | ||
| Additional money insurance i | ||
| Partner bank i | Citi Bank, HSBC Bank Australia, NAB | JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. |
| Brand power | ||
| Number of customers worldwide i | 1,200,000 | 4,500,000 |
| Annual revenue i | US$727,595,340 | US$299,000,000 |
| Monthly website search traffic i | 1.7M monthly visits | |
Costs
What we compare A comparison of what it costs to trade with Saxo and with Trading 212 in Australia, both on each trade and on holding the account.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for CFD/FX costs, since Saxo is cheaper on EUR/USD, at US$7 per lot (against Trading 212's US$13), has tighter S&P 500 CFD spreads, at 0.4 points (against Trading 212's 0.42 points), and has tighter gold CFD spreads, at 0.13 points (against Trading 212's 0.89 points). Neither Saxo nor Trading 212 charges inactivity fees or account maintenance fees.
Trading 212 is better than Saxo for real stock costs, since Trading 212 does not charge US stock fees (against Saxo's US$2), does not charge ETF fees (against Saxo's US$2), and does not charge real-time market data fees, unlike Saxo. Neither Saxo nor Trading 212 charges inactivity fees or account maintenance fees.
| Section score | Saxo 81 Best 68 -20 | Trading 212 42 -39 88 Best |
|---|---|---|
| Broker fees | ||
| Deposit fees i | ||
| Withdrawal fees i | ||
| Overnight fees i | ||
| Inactivity fees i | ||
| Currency conversion fees i | ||
| Discounts on volume i | ||
| Real time market data fee i | ||
| Dividend withholding i | ||
| Account opening fees i | ||
| Account maintenance fee i | ||
| Portfolio management fee i | ||
| Fees on CFDs | ||
| Forex commission per lot i | Free | Free |
| EUR/USD average standard spread i | ||
| EUR/USD average raw spread i | ||
| EUR/USD average fixed spread i | ||
| EUR/USD total cost per lot i | US$7 | US$13 |
| S&P 500 fees (CFD) i | 0.4 points | 0.42 points |
| Gold fees (CFD) i | 0.13 points | 0.89 points |
| Bitcoin fees (CFD) i | US$308 | US$70.17 |
| US stocks fees (CFD) i | US$0.08 | Free |
| Fees on stocks | ||
| Stock fee type i | Commission, Percentage | Free, Spread |
| US stocks fees (real) i | US$2 | Free |
| ETF fees (real) i | US$2 | Free |
| Management costs i | ||
| Connection costs i | ||
| Fees on futures | ||
| Futures fees per contract i | US$3 | |
| Platform fees i | ||
| Fees on options | ||
| Options fees per contract i | US$2 | |
| Event fees i | ||
| Fees on savings plans | ||
| IRA opening fee i | ||
| IRA maintenance fee i | ||
| 401k opening fee i | ||
| 401k maintenance fee i | ||
Available markets
What we compare A comparison of the markets and products you can trade with Saxo and with Trading 212 in Australia, and of how many instruments each one gives access to.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for CFD/FX markets, as Saxo gives access to 47,000 tradable symbols (against Trading 212's 10,000), lets you own bonds and funds outright, which Trading 212 does not, and offers futures on commodities, forex and indices, which Trading 212 does not. Both Saxo and Trading 212 offer CFDs on commodities, crypto, forex, indices and stocks, and let you own ETFs and stocks outright.
Saxo is better than Trading 212 for real stock markets, because Saxo lets you own bonds and funds outright, which Trading 212 does not, gives access to 47,000 tradable symbols (against Trading 212's 10,000), and offers futures on commodities, forex and indices, which Trading 212 does not. Both Saxo and Trading 212 let you own ETFs and stocks outright, and offer CFDs on commodities, crypto, forex, indices and stocks.
| Section score | Saxo 100 Best 100 Best | Trading 212 75 -25 30 -70 |
|---|---|---|
| Total tradable symbols i | 47,000 | 10,000 |
| Currency pairs i | ||
| Indices i | ||
| Commodities i | ||
| Stocks i | ||
| ETF i | ||
| Cryptocurrencies i | ||
| Bonds i | ||
| Interest rates i | ||
| Portfolios i | ||
| CFDs i | Commodities, Crypto, Forex, Indices, Stocks | Commodities, Crypto, ETF, Forex, Indices, Stocks |
| Futures i | Commodities, Forex, Indices | |
| Options i | Commodities, Forex, Indices | |
| Assets you can own i | Bonds, ETF, Funds, Stocks | ETF, Stocks |
Platform
What we compare A comparison of the trading platforms that Saxo and Trading 212 make available to their clients in Australia.Trading 212 is better than Saxo for platforms, since Trading 212 offers social trading, which Saxo does not. Both Saxo and Trading 212 offer a proprietary platform and one-click trading.
| Section score | Saxo 75 -6 75 -6 | Trading 212 81 Best 81 Best |
|---|---|---|
| Proprietary platform i | ||
| MetaTrader 4 i | ||
| MetaTrader 5 i | ||
| cTrader i | ||
| Social trading platform i | ||
| Copy trading platform i | ||
| ZuluTrade i | ||
| TradingView i | ||
| Duplitrade i | ||
| Mirror Trader i | ||
| NinjaTrader i | ||
| AutoChartist i | ||
| Real time pricing i | ||
| 5 digit pricing i | ||
| One-click trading i |
Mobile
What we compare A comparison of the mobile apps of Saxo and Trading 212 in Australia, and of what each one lets you do from your phone.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for mobile trading, because Saxo offers mobile trading signals, mobile charting tools and mobile drawing tools, which Trading 212 does not. Both Saxo and Trading 212 offer a proprietary mobile app and mobile price alerts.
| Section score | Saxo 87 Best 87 Best | Trading 212 65 -22 65 -22 |
|---|---|---|
| Proprietary app i | ||
| Social trading app i | ||
| Copy trading app i | ||
| MetaTrader 4 app i | ||
| MetaTrader 5 app i | ||
| cTrader app i | ||
| Mobile trading signals i | ||
| Mobile alerts i | ||
| Mobile charting tools i | ||
| Mobile drawing tools i | ||
| Mobile watchlist i | ||
| Smartwatch app i |
Trading features
What we compare A comparison of the trading tools and strategies that Saxo and Trading 212 allow on their platforms in Australia.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for CFD/FX trading features, since Saxo offers tier-1 liquidity providers, which Trading 212 does not, and allows for scalping and automated trading. Saxo and Trading 212 both offer negative balance protection and trailing stops.
Saxo is better than Trading 212 for real stock trading features, since Saxo has no minimum trade size on stocks (against Trading 212's US$1), offers tier-1 liquidity providers, which Trading 212 does not, and allows for automated trading. Both Saxo and Trading 212 offer trailing stops and API access.
| Section score | Saxo 85 Best 85 Best | Trading 212 67 -18 82 -3 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade execution | ||
| Broker type i | Hybrid | Agency |
| Average execution time i | 12 ms | |
| Slippage occurrence i | 20.7% | |
| Requotes occurrence i | ||
| Tier-1 liquidity providers i | ||
| PFOF i | ||
| Leverage | ||
| Major FX pairs leverage i | 30:1 | 30:1 |
| Minor/Exotic FX pairs leverage i | 20:1 | 20:1 |
| Major indices leverage i | 20:1 | 20:1 |
| Minor indices leverage i | 10:1 | 10:1 |
| Gold leverage i | 20:1 | 20:1 |
| Commodities leverage i | 10:1 | 10:1 |
| Equities leverage i | 5:1 | 5:1 |
| Cryptocurrency leverage i | 2:1 | 2:1 |
| Risk management | ||
| Stop losses i | ||
| Take profits i | ||
| Limit orders i | ||
| Trailing stop i | ||
| Margin call i | ||
| OCO orders i | ||
| Guaranteed stop loss i | ||
| Negative balance protection i | ||
| Minimum trade size (FX) i | 0.01 lots | 0.01 lots |
| Minimum trade size (stocks) i | US$0 | US$1 |
| Fractional stocks i | ||
| Trading compliance | ||
| Scalping strategies allowed i | ||
| Hedging strategies allowed i | ||
| Automated trading strategy allowed i | ||
| EAs use allowed i | ||
| HFT strategy allowed i | ||
| VPS use allowed i | ||
| API use allowed i | ||
| Price scraping allowed i | ||
| FIFO rule applies i | ||
Account types
What we compare A comparison of the kinds of account you can open at Saxo and at Trading 212 in Australia, and of who each one is meant for.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for CFD/FX account types, given that Saxo offers a professional traders account and a corporate account, which Trading 212 does not. Both Saxo and Trading 212 offer a demo account and a standard account.
Saxo is better than Trading 212 for real stock account types, since Saxo offers a corporate account and a retirement account, which Trading 212 does not. Saxo and Trading 212 both offer a stock investing account and a demo account.
| Section score | Saxo 42 Best 78 Best | Trading 212 27 -15 69 -9 |
|---|---|---|
| Demo account i | ||
| Unlimited demo account i | ||
| Standard account i | ||
| Micro account i | ||
| Cent account i | ||
| Nano account i | ||
| Raw spread account i | ||
| ECN account i | ||
| Swap-free account i | ||
| Islamic account i | ||
| Professional traders account i | ||
| Fixed spread account i | ||
| Spread betting account i | ||
| Copy trading account i | ||
| Corporate account i | ||
| Managed account i | ||
| Stock investing account i | ||
| Margin investing account i | ||
| Savings account i | ||
| Retirement account i |
Account opening
What we compare A comparison of what it takes to open and fund an account with Saxo and with Trading 212 in Australia.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for account opening, given that Saxo does not require a minimum deposit (against Trading 212's US$1), offers 11 account base currencies (against Trading 212's 4), and has no minimum withdrawal (against Trading 212's US$1). Saxo and Trading 212 both offer credit cards and debit cards.
| Section score | Saxo 80 Best 80 Best | Trading 212 65 -15 65 -15 |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum deposit i | US$0 | US$1 |
| Minimum withdrawal i | US$0 | US$1 |
| Wire transfers i | ||
| Credit cards i | ||
| Debit cards i | ||
| eWallets i | ||
| Local payment methods i | ||
| Account base currencies i | AUD, CAD, CHF, CNH, EUR, GBP, HKD, JPY, NZD, SGD, USD | AUD, EUR, USD, GBP |
| Deposit waiting time i | up to 2 business days | up to 3 business days |
| Withdrawal waiting time i | up to 5 business days | up to 2 business days |
| Bonus program i |
Customer care
What we compare A comparison of the customer support of Saxo and Trading 212 in Australia, in how it can be reached and how fast it answers.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for customer care, since Saxo has a website in 12 languages (against Trading 212's 11), and offers a dedicated account manager and phone support, which Trading 212 does not. Saxo and Trading 212 both offer email support and tax assistance.
| Section score | Saxo 78 Best 78 Best | Trading 212 54 -24 54 -24 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of languages supported i | 12 | 11 |
| Website languages i | Arabic, Danish, English, French, Hungarian, Italian, Dutch, Norwegian, Polish, Russian, Slovenian, Chinese | Arabic, German, English, French, Italian, Dutch, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Chinese |
| Website available in English i | ||
| Customer support languages i | English | English |
| Customer support in English i | ||
| Call back request i | ||
| Email support i | ||
| Phone support i | ||
| Live chat i | ||
| Priority customer support i | ||
| Dedicated account manager i | ||
| Cash sweep i | ||
| Stock lending i | ||
| Distributes proceeds i | ||
| Tax withholding agent i | ||
| Tax assistance i |
Learning
What we compare A comparison of the educational material that Saxo and Trading 212 provide to their clients in Australia.Saxo is better than Trading 212 for learning, since Saxo offers education for advanced traders, webinars and professional reports, which Trading 212 does not. Both Saxo and Trading 212 offer education for beginners and an education center.
| Section score | Saxo 100 Best 100 Best | Trading 212 43 -57 43 -57 |
|---|---|---|
| Education | ||
| Education center i | ||
| Education for beginners i | ||
| Education for advanced traders i | ||
| Webinars i | ||
| Tutorials i | ||
| Glossary i | ||
| Research | ||
| Economic calendar i | ||
| Traders' sentiment i | ||
| Daily market commentary i | ||
| Daily trading ideas i | ||
| News via social media i | ||
| Professional reports i | ||
| Watchlist i | ||
Saxo vs Trading 212: which one should you choose?
Saxo
CFD/FX Choose Saxo if you want a CFD and forex broker with low trading costs and a wide choice of markets.
Stocks Choose Saxo if you want a broker for securities investing with bonds, funds, options and futures.
Open Account CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.
Trading 212
CFD/FX Choose Trading 212 if you want an online CFD broker with hedging and a demo account that has no expiry.
Stocks Choose Trading 212 if you want a share dealing service with commission-free US stocks.
Open Account CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.Other popular comparisons
Below are other head-to-head comparisons that include Saxo or Trading 212, each scored with the same data and method as this page.
